需要金幣： 500 個(gè)金幣 |
資料包括：完整論文 |  |
 |
| 轉(zhuǎn)換比率：金額 X 10=金幣數(shù)量， 例100元=1000金幣 | 論文字?jǐn)?shù)：見簡(jiǎn)介 |  | |
| 折扣與優(yōu)惠：團(tuán)購(gòu)最低可5折優(yōu)惠 - 了解詳情 | 論文格式：Word格式(*.doc) |  |
譯文（字?jǐn)?shù) 3094）： 股東知情權(quán) “所有權(quán)和控制權(quán)分離”這句話是由Berle和Means在1932年提出的，但這個(gè)概念有著深厚的歷史淵源。 南海泡沫案例是當(dāng)時(shí)眾多轟動(dòng)事件中最為著名的一個(gè)，當(dāng)時(shí)將彈劾內(nèi)閣的建議提交給英國(guó)議會(huì)的銀行家被放置在裝滿蛇的麻袋扔進(jìn)泰晤士河。令人震撼的不僅是這件事，更震撼的后果是在這樣情況下頒布的1720年的“泡沫法案”。“泡沫法案”要求新型股份制公司被合并，并提出區(qū)別于一個(gè)企業(yè)的所有者，將股東有限責(zé)任和管理分開。 政治經(jīng)濟(jì)學(xué)的創(chuàng)始人之一亞當(dāng)·斯密，在1776年質(zhì)疑成立股份制公司的價(jià)值，他認(rèn)為資本是由股東提供而不是管理者自己提供，覺得他們減少了財(cái)政激勵(lì)管理者去執(zhí)行事務(wù)。
外文原文（字符數(shù) 15073）： 外文出處：Janine Rolfe .保持良好的公司，第65卷第10期，586-590。 Shareholders’ right to know It was in 1932 that the phrase ‘separation of ownership and control’ was coined by Berle and Means, but the concept’s origins have deep historical roots. The South Sea Bubble Case is renowned for many events not least of which was impeachment of the Cabinet of the time and a recommendation to the British Parliament to place bankers in sacks filled with snakes to be thrown into the River Thames! Not quite as stirring but of greater consequence was the ‘Bubble Act’ of 1720 which was enacted following the case. The ‘Bubble Act’ required new joint-stock companies to be incorporated and in so doing, instituted the concepts of：limited liability of shareholders and manager separate and distinguishable from a business’ owner. |
