需要金幣： 600 個金幣 |
資料包括：完整論文 |  |
 |
| 轉(zhuǎn)換比率：金額 X 10=金幣數(shù)量， 例100元=1000金幣 | 論文字數(shù)：35頁 |  | |
| 折扣與優(yōu)惠：團購最低可5折優(yōu)惠 - 了解詳情 | 論文格式：Adobe Reader格式(*.pdf) |  |
摘要:大學生是社會的重要群體，祖國未來建設的中堅力量。但是在論文壓力、就業(yè)壓力等許多問題面前，大學生抑郁、煩惱甚至跳樓自殺等事件此起彼伏。大學生群體的生活質(zhì)量和心理健康越來越受到關注，大學生的主觀幸福感問題也日漸引起教育工作者以及眾多學者的研究與探討。 本文采取實證研究方法，以花都區(qū)高校大學生為研究對象，采用Ed Diener等人編制的《國際大學調(diào)查》量表并且結合花都區(qū)高校大學生的基本情況修訂的主觀幸福感量表研究工具，探討高校大學生主觀幸福感的結構和現(xiàn)狀，并且進一步探究不同的人口統(tǒng)計學變量對大學生主觀幸福感的影響。本文選取廣州市花都區(qū)3所高校大學生232名，共發(fā)放204份問卷，有效回收190份問卷，并且通過SPSS統(tǒng)計軟件進行數(shù)據(jù)分析，其中男生89名，女生101名。結果得出，結果表明：（1）花都區(qū)高校大學生總體主觀幸福感水平處于中上水平；（2）不同個體特征的大學生，其主觀幸福感存在差異。在總體主觀幸福感因子存在差異的方面有性別、年級和專業(yè)；在總體生活滿意度因子存在差異的方面有家庭經(jīng)濟狀況、年級和居住地；在積極情緒因子存在差異的方面有性別、家庭經(jīng)濟狀況、年級、居住地和獨生；消極情緒因子不存在顯著的統(tǒng)計學差異。 關鍵詞：主觀幸福感，大學生，實證研究
Abstract:Students as an important group in today's society, the backbone of the motherland's future development. However, the pressure in the paper, the employment pressure in front of many of the problems, college students, depression, worry and even suicide and other killings. College students and mental health quality of life more and more be attended, the subjective well-being problem of the students are increasingly aroused the educators and scholars to study and research. This empirical research methods adopt the college students of Huadu District as objects, with the "International University survey" scale which compiled by Ed Diener and others, and the combination of Huadu District, the basic situation of university students in the revised subjective SWB research tools to explore the college students the structure of subjective well-being and status, and further explore the different demographic variables on subjective well being. This paper selects the Huadu District of Guangzhou, about 232 college students, 204 questionnaires were distributed, 190 were returned valid questionnaires, and through the SPSS statistical software for data analysis, in which 89 boys and girls 101. The results obtained, the results show that: (1) college students of Huadu District, the overall level of subjective well-being in the middle and upper levels; (2) the individual characteristics of students, differences in subjective well-being. In general the subjective well-being factor differences have sex, grade and professional. Factor in the overall life satisfaction are different dimensions of family economic status, year and place of residence; differences in positive emotional factor in the dimension of gender, economic status, grade, place of residence and only child; negative emotions factor does not exist statistically significant difference. Keyword: SWB，University student，Empirical study
|
